Almond Joy – Crunchy, Coconutty, and Tasty

Almond Joy is basically Mounds, but with the addition of almonds, and with milk chocolate instead of dark.  It’s fine, but Mounds is clearly the superior of the two.

The milk chocolate actually makes a pretty huge difference.  The dark chocolate on a Mounds bar gives it a more pronounced chocolately flavour, and its slight bitterness contrasts very nicely with the very sweet coconut.  The milk chocolate here is decent, but it’s just sweet on sweet; I missed the dark chocolate.

Almond Joy

Then, of course, there are the almonds.  You’d think they’d be the star of the show; they’re right there in the name.  Oddly enough, they don’t add much — they bring some crunchiness, but their flavour is completely lost.  If they had a toastier flavour they might have been able to nudge through, but alas, they’re fairly bland.

Almond Joy

You’d think the coconut would be exactly the same as in a Mounds (they’re both made by Hershey, after all), but the coconutty centre here seems a bit more dry.  This emphasizes the problem coconut desserts tend to have, where you’re still munching on coconut bits long after the flavour has disappeared.

Still, the chocolate/coconut combo continues to be delicious, and while I prefer Mounds (and Bounty, the king of the chocolate/coconut castle), Almond Joy is tasty enough.

3 out of 4

Manufactured by: Hershey
Nutritional info (2 pieces, 45 grams): 220 calories, 13 grams of fat (9 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat), 0 mg of cholesterol, 50 mg of sodium, 26 grams of carbohydrates, 2 grams of fibre, 21 grams of sugar, 2 grams of protein.
Ingredients: Corn syrup, sugar, coconut, almonds, vegetable oil (palm oil, shea oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, and/or palm kernel oil) chocolate, milk, contains 2% or less of: lactose (milk), milk fat, skim milk, cocoa, whey (milk), salt, lecithin (soy), PGPR, hydrolyzed milk protein, sodium metabisulfite to maintain freshness, vanillin, artificial flavor.

Mounds – A Tasty Combo of Coconut and Dark Chocolate

Mounds and Bounty are weirdly similar.  They both feature sweet coconut covered in chocolate, they’re both divided into two bars, and both feature distinctive rounded edges.  Mounds is the original, however.  It was first released in 1920; Bounty didn’t come out until 1951.

I’ll admit I have a soft spot for Bounty thanks to a childhood fondness for the stuff, but the two are very, very similar.

Mounds

The biggest difference is that Mounds is covered in dark chocolate versus Bounty’s milk chocolate (apparently there is a dark chocolate version of Bounty, though I don’t recall ever seeing it).  I think pretty much every candy bar is improved by subbing dark chocolate for milk; it delivers more chocolatey flavour than its milky counterpart, and its slight bitterness balances well with the sweetness of a candy bar.  So that’s definitely a point in Mounds’ favour.

Mounds

The coconut portion of Mounds seems slightly creamier, but I think the coconut itself is a bit more roughly chopped, which means that you’ll still be chewing it even after the coconut flavour has mostly faded away.  Point: Bounty.

Still, that’s a fairly minor complaint; both are delicious and extremely similar.  I prefer Bounty, but I think that has more to do with childhood nostalgia than anything else.

3.5 out of 4

Manufactured by: Hershey
Nutritional info (2 pieces, 49 grams): 230 calories, 13 grams of fat (10 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat), 0 mg of cholesterol, 55 mg of sodium, 29 grams of carbohydrates, 3 grams of fibre, 21 grams of sugar, 2 grams of protein.
Ingredients: Corn syrup, semi-sweet chocolate (chocolate, sugar, milk fat, lecithin (soy), PGPR, vanillin, artificial flavor, milk), coconut, sugar, contains 2% or less of: salt, hydrolyzed milk protein, sodium metabisulfite to maintain freshness.

Cherry Blossom – It Tastes Better than it Looks

The packaging for Cherry Blossom is bizarrely unappealing.  If I hadn’t known how long it’s been around (since the 1890s!), I would have assumed it’s part of some sort of Producers-esque scheme to create an intentionally failed candy.  But it’s been on the shelves for well over a hundred years, so I guess someone’s eating it.

It’s hard to get over how ugly the packaging is.  I’ve seen it on the shelves since I was a kid, but I haven’t tried it until now, because why would I??  And let’s make something clear: I was a fat kid who wanted to try every candy bar in existence, and I still had no interest in this thing.

Cherry Blossom

The ugliness persists after you open the box and unwrap it from the foil (yes, it’s still wrapped in foil, because apparently the whole experience is meant to replicate being a Depression-era hobo who can’t afford anything better).  Is it impolite to say that it looks like a turd?  It is?  Okay, then I won’t say that it absolutely, positively looks like a turd, even though we can all clearly see that it looks like a turd.

Cherry Blossom

Happily, it tastes better than it looks.  It’s not great, mind you, but it’s not nearly as terrible as you’d think based on the packaging.  The milk chocolate exterior features peanuts and coconut, which compliments the cherry and the goopy, cherry-flavoured syrup reasonably well.  It’s a Hershey product, so the quality of the chocolate is about what you’d expect.  The whole thing is way, way too sweet (a dark chocolate version of this might actually be pretty good), but if you like the cherry/chocolate combo, you’ll probably enjoy this.

2.5 out of 4

Manufactured by: Hershey
Nutritional info (1 piece, 45 grams): 210 calories, 10 grams of fat (6 grams of saturated fat, 0.1 grams of trans fat), 0 mg cholesterol, 40 mg sodium, 29 grams of carbohydrates, 27 grams of sugar, 1 gram of fibre, 2 grams of protein.
Ingredients: Sugar, modified palm oil and modified vegetable oil (shea, sunflower and/or safflower), modified milk ingredients, unsweetened chocolate, coconut, peanuts, cherries, corn syrup, lactose, soy lecithin, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, invertase, natural and artificial flavours, salt, acetic acid, citric acid, sodium benzoate, colour, sodium metabisulphite, potassium sorbate, sulphites.

Bounty – Delicious Coconut and Chocolate

I’m really not sure how I’ve managed to get to over a hundred reviews on this blog without doing Bounty, which has always been one of my favourites.  In fact, I think it might have been my absolute favourite candy bar when I was a kid, which means that in a lot of ways, my warm fuzzy feelings for Bounty are tied up in childhood nostalgia.  So take everything I say about it with a grain of salt.

It’s really good, though.

Bounty

It’s just coconut and milk chocolate, but as far as these types of candy bars go (I think Almond Joy and Mounds are the other big ones), Bounty is where it’s at.  The coconut is very sweet but not overwhelming, with a nice coconut flavour.  It’s fairly dense, and moist enough that you’re not going to be chewing on dried up coconut bits long after the flavour has gone.

Bounty

The generous layer of decent quality milk chocolate compliments the coconut perfectly.  The fat kid version of me bought these on a fairly regular basis, and eating it again now, I can definitely see why.

4 out of 4

Manufactured by: Mars
Nutritional info (2 pieces, 57 grams): 270 calories, 13 grams of fat (10 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat), 5 mg of cholesterol, 55 mg of sodium, 36 grams of carbohydrates, 2 grams of fibre, 28 grams of sugar, 2 grams of protein.
Ingredients: Milk chocolate (sugar, modified milk ingredients, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, lactose, soy lecithin, artificial flavour), coconut, sugar, glucose syrup, glycerol monostearate, glycerol, salt, artificial flavour, sulphites.

Ritter Sport: Coconut – A Tasty Combo of Coconut and Chocolate

I was under the impression that Ritter Sport had gone downhill; the last couple I’ve had have been fairly mediocre, so I had mostly written them off.  But this one was quite tasty!  So there’s my entire world-view, shaken to its very core.

Ritter Sport: Coconut

I will admit that I’m a sucker for the chocolate/coconut combo; Bounty would easily be in my top five favourite candy bars.  So maybe I’m just going easy on this one because the combination is so inherently delightful.

Either way, I thoroughly enjoyed this.  It’s basically like Bounty, but with a higher chocolate to coconut ratio.  Oddly, the chocolate flavour isn’t quite as pronounced as you’d think it would be; it has a bit of a generic sweetness, and I wish it packed a more chocolatey punch.

Ritter Sport: Coconut

That’s pretty much my only real complaint here.  Otherwise, the chocolate is nice and creamy, and there’s a good balance of coconut flavour along with a mild crispiness from the flakes.  I don’t know that I’d pick this over a Bounty, but then the increased amount of chocolate makes it feel fairly distinct.

3 out of 4

Manufactured by: Alfred Ritter GmbH & Co. KG
Nutritional info (6 pieces, 38 grams): 220 calories, 15 grams of fat (9 grams of saturated fat, 0.1 grams of trans fat), 5 mg cholesterol, 25 mg of sodium, 20 grams of carbohydrates, 1 gram of fibre, 19 grams of sugar, 2 grams of protein.
Ingredients: Sugar, palm fat, cocoa butter, grated coconut (9%), whole milk powder, cocoa mass, skim milk powder, lactose, butter fat, coconut milk (1%), glucose syrup, soy lecithin, pea protein, concentrated lemon juice.